PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEMMX vs. RYRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEMMX achieves a 20.14% return, which is significantly higher than RYRRX's 16.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WEMMX having a 9.20% annualized return and RYRRX not far ahead at 9.26%.


WEMMX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.68%
YTD
20.14%
6M
23.78%
1Y
38.71%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
9.20%

RYRRX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.47%
YTD
16.80%
6M
17.56%
1Y
39.66%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
20.14%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%15.47%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
16.80%10.88%9.72%15.17%-21.70%13.23%17.81%23.57%-12.58%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WEMMX and RYRRX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.93

The correlation between WEMMX and RYRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEMMX vs. RYRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RYRRX
RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEMMXRYRRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.10

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.91

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

3.45

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.21

+0.06

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the RYRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEMMX and RYRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEMMXRYRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.10

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.20

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.27

+0.37

Drawdowns

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEMMX drawdown since its inception was -42.48%, smaller than the maximum RYRRX drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEMMX and RYRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEMMXRYRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.48%

-60.36%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-11.43%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-28.03%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-33.02%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-42.84%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.04%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-12.23%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.23%

-0.21%

Volatility

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) is 5.18%, while Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that WEMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEMMXRYRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.59%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

13.55%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

19.14%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

22.56%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

23.45%

-3.00%

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEMMX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than RYRRX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEMMX vs. RYRRX - Dividend Comparison

WEMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.98%, more than RYRRX's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
0.56%0.65%1.02%0.19%0.00%12.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%4.82%0.00%2.66%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
18.98%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEMMX and RYRRX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYRRX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to WEMMX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEMMX dropped -42.48% vs RYRRX's -60.36%.

WEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEMMX and RYRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer