WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WELS.DE (Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and WH2E.DE (Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WELS.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care while WH2E.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELS.DE returned 2.22%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for WH2E.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WELS.DE having a -3.35% return and WH2E.DE slightly higher at -3.24%.

WELS.DE

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: -3.35%
• 6M: -2.82%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 2.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WH2E.DE

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: -3.24%
• 6M: -2.41%
• 1Y: 10.18%
• 3Y*: 3.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WELS.DE Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc	-3.35%	1.05%	7.20%	2.09%
WH2E.DE Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc	-3.24%	2.78%	7.94%	1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WELS.DE and WH2E.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.97

The correlation between WELS.DE and WH2E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELS.DE

WELS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
WELS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WELS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WELS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
WELS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

WH2E.DE

WH2E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 21
WH2E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WH2E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
WH2E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 20
WH2E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
WH2E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELS.DE	WH2E.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.68	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	1.14	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.13	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	0.83	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	2.15	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the WH2E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELS.DE and WH2E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELS.DE	WH2E.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.68	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.20	+0.02

Drawdowns

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, roughly equal to the maximum WH2E.DE drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELS.DE and WH2E.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELS.DE	WH2E.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-22.19%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	-12.23%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.13%	-22.19%	-0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.08%	-10.45%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.30%	-6.94%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	4.73%	+0.61%

Volatility

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELS.DE	WH2E.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	5.21%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	10.46%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.60%	14.86%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	13.91%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.59%	13.91%	-0.32%

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WELS.DE and WH2E.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WELS.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELS.DE nor WH2E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELS.DE and WH2E.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, WELS.DE and WH2E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WELS.DE or WH2E.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELS.DE or WH2E.DE?

WELS.DE and WH2E.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

What is the main difference between WELS.DE and WH2E.DE?

WELS.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care, while WH2E.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco.