WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE
WELM.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - WELM.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples while CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELM.DE returned 0.41%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for CEMG.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WELM.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELM.DE achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -7.03% return.
WELM.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- -3.32%
- 3Y*
- 0.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELM.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 2.90% | -6.92% | 9.50% | -2.21% | 2.15% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELM.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELM.DE
CEMG.DE
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELM.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELM.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.91 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.58 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -1.23 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELM.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.64 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.22 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELM.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.DE drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELM.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELM.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -33.94% | +20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -14.05% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.66% | -20.18% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -18.75% | +9.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -12.26% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 6.68% | -1.05% |
Volatility
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that WELM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELM.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.37% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 10.24% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 12.88% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 18.54% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 18.33% | -5.83% |
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WELM.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
WELM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELM.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 2.27% | 2.18% | 2.02% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WELM.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
WELM.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples, while CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELM.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELM.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer