WELL vs. NEM
WELL (Welltower Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. WELL operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WELL returned 15.50%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for NEM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WELL vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, WELL has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 15.50%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.
WELL
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 40.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
NEM
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -15.55%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 81.14%
- 3Y*
- 36.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
WELL vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL Welltower Inc. | 16.22% | 49.86% | 43.07% | 41.79% | -21.18% | 36.98% | -17.19% | 23.04% | 15.31% | 0.22% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 0.82% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL and NEM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.15 |
The correlation between WELL and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WELL:
$2.02
NEM:
$6.34
WELL:
106.16
NEM:
15.82
WELL:
2.35
NEM:
0.41
WELL:
12.85
NEM:
4.83
WELL:
$11.63B
NEM:
$17.23B
WELL:
$3.25B
NEM:
$8.97B
WELL:
$3.00B
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
WELL
NEM
WELL vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WELL | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.78 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 7.58 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WELL vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.33% | -81.30% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -29.39% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -36.57% | +23.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.78% | -62.40% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.33% | -62.40% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -23.71% | +21.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -41.37% | +31.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 10.73% | -5.62% |
Volatility
WELL vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Welltower Inc. (WELL) is 9.54%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that WELL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 15.74% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 37.43% | -20.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 47.44% | -25.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 37.99% | -14.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.90% | 35.67% | -3.77% |
Dividends
WELL vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than NEM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.02% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.38% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
Financials
WELL vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Welltower Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WELL and NEM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to WELL (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs NEM's -81.30%.
WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WELL and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer