WELL vs. CLILF
WELL (Welltower Inc.) and CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — WELL in REIT - Healthcare Facilities, CLILF in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 3 years, WELL returned 40.64%/yr vs -5.11%/yr for CLILF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WELL vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than CLILF's 6.49% return.
WELL
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- 40.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WELL vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL Welltower Inc. | 16.22% | 49.86% | 43.07% | 41.79% | -21.18% | 3.89% |
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -1.09% | -23.92% | 6.00% | -1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL and CLILF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
WELL:
$155.59B
CLILF:
$7.72B
WELL:
$2.02
CLILF:
SGD 0.05
WELL:
106.16
CLILF:
52.17
WELL:
12.85
CLILF:
3.93
WELL:
3.55
CLILF:
0.79
WELL:
$11.63B
CLILF:
SGD 2.91B
WELL:
$3.25B
CLILF:
SGD 2.22B
WELL:
$3.00B
CLILF:
SGD 153.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank
WELL
CLILF
WELL vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WELL | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.52 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 1.03 | +7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WELL vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CLILF drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and CLILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.33% | -66.07% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -29.26% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -45.96% | +32.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -53.74% | +51.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -44.07% | +33.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 14.66% | -9.55% |
Volatility
WELL vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Welltower Inc. (WELL) is 9.54%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that WELL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 10.69% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 54.59% | -37.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 62.76% | -41.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 79.89% | -56.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.90% | 79.89% | -47.99% |
Dividends
WELL vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison
WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than CLILF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.38% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
Financials
WELL vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Welltower Inc. and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WELL vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison
WELL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
WELL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported an operating income of 752.32M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
WELL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a net income of 728.67M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WELL and CLILF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to WELL (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs CLILF's -66.07%.
WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WELL and CLILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer