WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE
WELE.DE (Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and SPQB.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - WELE.DE tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select while SPQB.DE tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELE.DE returned 11.24%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for SPQB.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WELE.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPQB.DE.
Performance
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELE.DE achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPQB.DE's 5.30% return.
WELE.DE
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 18.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPQB.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELE.DE Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 8.45% | 0.70% | 16.40% | 5.78% |
SPQB.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF | 5.30% | -0.77% | 20.64% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELE.DE and SPQB.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between WELE.DE and SPQB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELE.DE
SPQB.DE
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WELE.DE) and Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELE.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.53 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 9.14 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELE.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.11 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELE.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than SPQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELE.DE and SPQB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELE.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.73% | -16.15% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | -3.10% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -16.15% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -2.58% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.20% | +0.75% |
Volatility
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WELE.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.24% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) at 1.19%. This indicates that WELE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELE.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 1.19% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.47% | 4.25% | +3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.35% | 7.42% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 9.54% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 9.54% | +4.87% |
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPQB.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WELE.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELE.DE nor SPQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WELE.DE and SPQB.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
WELE.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select, while SPQB.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELE.DE and 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELE.DE and SPQB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer