WELD vs. TOLZ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WELD (Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. WELD is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. WELD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.

Performance

WELD vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF (WELD) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WELD

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOLZ

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.52%
• 6M: 11.77%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 7.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELD vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WELD Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF	-11.04%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WELD and TOLZ is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2026	-0.44

WELD vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WELD	TOLZ
Industrials	73.5%	5.5%
Technology	12.9%	0.4%
Basic Materials	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	0.8%
Energy	1.0%	35.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Financial Services	-	2.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	7.2%
Utilities	-	24.2%

Return for Risk

WELD vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOLZ

TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELD vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF (WELD) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WELD	TOLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.83	—

Drawdowns

WELD vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELD drawdown since its inception was -11.04%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELD and TOLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELD	TOLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.04%	-39.33%	+28.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.04%	-1.11%	-9.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-6.59%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WELD	TOLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.23%	10.60%	+22.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.23%	14.02%	+19.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.23%	16.22%	+17.01%

WELD vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

WELD vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

WELD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	2.93%	3.99%	3.53%	3.34%	3.01%	3.28%	3.16%	2.96%	3.63%	3.30%	2.62%	3.67%
WELD Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELD and TOLZ in my portfolio?

WELD and TOLZ have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WELD or TOLZ?

On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELD or TOLZ?

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WELD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WELD or TOLZ?

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for WELD.

What is the main difference between WELD and TOLZ?

They also come from different issuers: Tema and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WELD and 0.46% for TOLZ.