PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEEL vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEEL vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEEL vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEL achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -0.44% return.


WEEL

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
0.46%
6M
4.35%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEEL vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEEL vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEL
WEEL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WEEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEL vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEELLQTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

0.74

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.02

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.37

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.51

4.15

+5.36

WEEL vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEL and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEELLQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.74

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.90

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between WEEL and LQTI is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WEEL vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.


TTM20252024
WEEL
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
13.05%12.72%6.88%
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
9.07%7.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

WEEL vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEL drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEL and LQTI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEELLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-3.41%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-3.41%

-9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.03%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-0.78%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.12%

+0.95%

Volatility

WEEL vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that WEEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEELLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.66%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.43%

3.87%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

6.23%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

6.11%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.25%

6.11%

+7.14%