PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEEK vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEEK vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEK achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -44.14% return.


WEEK

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.72%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
-3.51%
1M
-21.02%
YTD
-44.14%
6M
-49.89%
1Y
-31.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEEK vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
1.63%3.37%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-44.14%108.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEK and PLTW is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEEK vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEK
WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEK vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEEKPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+18.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.26

0.95

+3.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

28.89

-0.57

+29.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

247.92

-1.13

+249.05

WEEK vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEK Sharpe Ratio is 8.82, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEK and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEEK vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEK drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEK and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEEKPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-54.31%

+54.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-54.31%

+54.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-54.31%

+54.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-23.44%

+23.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

27.46%

-27.44%

Volatility

WEEK vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) is 0.13%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 23.27%. This indicates that WEEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEEKPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

23.27%

-23.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.27%

46.44%

-46.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43%

61.61%

-61.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

74.25%

-73.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

74.25%

-73.86%

WEEK vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEK has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEEK vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

WEEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than PLTW's 157.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
157.35%72.40%
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
3.69%3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEEK and PLTW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to WEEK (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEK dropped -0.13% vs PLTW's -54.31%.

On 1-year performance, WEEK leads with 3.74% vs -31.01% for PLTW. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WEEK has performed better with a 3.74% return vs -31.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 157.35%, compared with 3.69% for WEEK.

WEEK is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for WEEK and 0.99% for PLTW.

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.82 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEEK and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer