WEEK vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WEEK returned 3.81% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEEK charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

WEEK vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEK achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

WEEK

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEEK vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	1.44%	3.37%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEK and CSHP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

WEEK vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEK

WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 99
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEK vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WEEK	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.29	11.91	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	19.14	31.26	-12.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.65	7.44	-2.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.49	65.71	-36.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	263.82	432.16	-168.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WEEK vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEK Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is comparable to the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEK and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WEEK	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.29	11.91	-2.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	10.05	10.75	-0.70

Drawdowns

WEEK vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEK drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEK and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEEK	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.13%	-0.08%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.13%	-0.06%	-0.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.00%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%

Volatility

WEEK vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) have volatilities of 0.07% and 0.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEEK	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.25%	0.24%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41%	0.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.39%	0.40%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.39%	0.40%	-0.01%

WEEK vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEK has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WEEK vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

WEEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	3.72%	3.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEEK and CSHP in my portfolio?

WEEK and CSHP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEEK or CSHP?

CSHP has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to WEEK (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEK dropped -0.13% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, WEEK or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs 3.81% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEEK or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEEK or CSHP?

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEEK or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.72% for WEEK.

What is the main difference between WEEK and CSHP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for WEEK and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 9.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.