PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEED vs. XPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEED vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEED achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than XPAY's 9.72% return.


WEED

1D
-5.54%
1M
3.43%
YTD
1.75%
6M
5.21%
1Y
121.95%
3Y*
-3.49%
5Y*
10Y*

XPAY

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.13%
YTD
9.72%
6M
9.26%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEED vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
1.75%19.40%-42.46%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
9.72%16.78%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WEED and XPAY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.23

WEED vs. XPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WEED
XPAY

Healthcare

60.0%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

16.3%
1.8%

Technology

6.3%
39.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Healthcare

WEED
60.0%
XPAY
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

WEED
17.3%
XPAY
4.5%

Real Estate

WEED
16.3%
XPAY
1.8%

Technology

WEED
6.3%
XPAY
39.0%

Basic Materials

WEED

-

XPAY
1.7%

Communication Services

WEED

-

XPAY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WEED

-

XPAY
9.9%

Energy

WEED

-

XPAY
3.1%

Financial Services

WEED

-

XPAY
11.1%

Industrials

WEED

-

XPAY
7.8%

Utilities

WEED

-

XPAY
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEED vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEED
WEED Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
WEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEED Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEED vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEEDXPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.82

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

12.61

-8.41

WEED vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEED Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the XPAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEED and XPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEED vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEED drawdown since its inception was -88.37%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEED and XPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEEDXPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.37%

-18.20%

-70.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.01%

-9.34%

-44.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.81%

-1.67%

-72.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-2.37%

-61.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.15%

2.08%

+27.07%

Volatility

WEED vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) has a higher volatility of 21.13% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) at 4.57%. This indicates that WEED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEEDXPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.13%

4.57%

+16.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.25%

9.63%

+55.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.63%

12.34%

+101.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.52%

16.82%

+65.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.52%

16.82%

+65.70%

WEED vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEED has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEED vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

WEED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.82%.


PositionTTM20252024
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
20.82%21.21%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEED and XPAY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEED has higher volatility (21.13%) compared to XPAY (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEED dropped -88.37% vs XPAY's -18.20%.

On 1-year performance, WEED leads with 121.95% vs 26.22% for XPAY. On fees, WEED is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WEED has performed better with a 121.95% return vs 26.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEED is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.82%, compared with 0.00% for WEED.

WEED is categorized as Cannabis, while XPAY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WEED and 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEED and XPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer