WEBS vs. TERG
WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WEBS is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. WEBS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
WEBS vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 257.69% return.
WEBS
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- -18.41%
- 3Y*
- -45.82%
- 5Y*
- -33.10%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 13.54%
- 1M
- 50.77%
- YTD
- 257.69%
- 6M
- 250.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBS vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | -3.43% | 0.22% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 257.69% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBS and TERG is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBS vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
WEBS
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WEBS vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBS vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -49.52% | -50.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.53% | -8.83% | -90.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.09% | -14.66% | -76.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.79% | — | — |
Volatility
WEBS vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.49% | 144.80% | -85.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.06% | 144.80% | -62.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.78% | 144.80% | -55.02% |
WEBS vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBS vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | 3.38% | 3.77% | 8.02% | 8.51% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBS and TERG have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.
WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for WEBS and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer