PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.


WEBS

1D
0.85%
1M
15.73%
YTD
3.81%
6M
7.21%
1Y
-11.42%
3Y*
-45.58%
5Y*
-31.10%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
3.81%-40.66%-56.62%-75.58%117.15%-39.82%-87.18%-10.90%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

-0.80

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBS
WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBS^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.32

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.46

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

10.92

-11.42

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-56.78%

-42.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-9.10%

-44.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.33%

-18.90%

-71.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-25.43%

-71.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.50%

-3.21%

-96.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.10%

-10.71%

-80.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.74%

2.04%

+21.70%

Volatility

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 22.27% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.27%

4.89%

+17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.43%

9.93%

+36.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.80%

12.57%

+47.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.13%

17.00%

+65.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.76%

18.08%

+71.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBS and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEBS has higher volatility (22.27%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBS and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer