PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return.


WEBS

1D
-7.56%
1M
-9.28%
6M
-21.86%
YTD
-14.38%
1Y
-19.62%
3Y*
-44.46%
5Y*
-33.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-51.17%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$830.56K$855.34K$1.32M

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
-14.38%-40.66%-56.62%-75.58%117.15%-39.82%-87.18%-10.90%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC is -0.71, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

-0.80

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.82 (5 years) to -0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEBS
WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBS^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.25

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.00

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

8.49

-8.94

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-56.78%

-42.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-9.10%

-44.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.33%

-18.90%

-71.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-25.43%

-71.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.58%

-1.58%

-98.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.24%

-10.70%

-80.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.63%

2.14%

+23.49%

Volatility

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

3.51%

+14.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.62%

10.11%

+38.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.75%

12.87%

+48.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.30%

17.01%

+65.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.39%

18.07%

+71.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBS and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEBS has higher volatility (17.91%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBS and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer