PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -21.45% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.16% return.


WEBS

1D
4.02%
1M
-19.57%
YTD
-21.45%
6M
-18.76%
1Y
-35.37%
3Y*
-50.43%
5Y*
-38.11%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.13%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
-21.45%-40.66%-56.62%-75.58%117.15%-39.82%-87.18%-13.16%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

-0.80

The correlation between WEBS and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.82 (5 years) to -0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBS
WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.62

2.39

-3.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.70

3.25

-3.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.43

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

3.16

-3.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.60

14.61

-16.21

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

2.39

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.75

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.47

-1.06

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-56.78%

-42.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-9.10%

-44.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.33%

-18.90%

-71.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-25.43%

-71.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

0.00%

-99.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.09%

-10.72%

-80.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.08%

1.97%

+21.11%

Volatility

WEBS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.84%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBS^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

2.84%

+11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.06%

8.98%

+34.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.33%

11.87%

+45.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.78%

16.90%

+64.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.84%

18.07%

+71.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBS and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEBS has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to ^GSPC (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBS and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer