WEBS vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WEBS is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, WEBS returned -30.71% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. WEBS charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

WEBS vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -16.82% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

WEBS

• 1D: 5.89%
• 1M: -13.46%
• YTD: -16.82%
• 6M: -14.14%
• 1Y: -30.71%
• 3Y*: -49.47%
• 5Y*: -36.70%
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBS vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares	-16.82%	-40.66%	-7.22%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and MULL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	-0.38

The correlation between WEBS and MULL shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (all time) to -0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WEBS vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBS

WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 4
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBS vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WEBS	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	46.71	-47.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	7.02	-7.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.89	-0.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	116.34	-116.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	390.40	-391.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WEBS vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WEBS	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	46.71	-47.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	7.45	-8.04

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEBS	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.63%	-72.29%	-27.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.54%	-53.09%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.60%	0.00%	-99.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.09%	-20.62%	-70.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.19%	15.79%	+7.40%

Volatility

WEBS vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) is 15.72%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that WEBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEBS	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.72%	55.41%	-39.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.46%	105.59%	-62.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.60%	132.38%	-74.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.81%	136.22%	-54.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.84%	136.22%	-46.38%

WEBS vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEBS vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares	3.92%	3.77%	8.02%	8.51%	0.20%	0.00%	1.11%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEBS and MULL in my portfolio?

WEBS and MULL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEBS or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to WEBS (15.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, WEBS or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -30.71% for WEBS. On fees, WEBS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, WEBS has been the lower-risk option at 15.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEBS or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -30.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEBS or MULL?

WEBS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEBS or MULL?

WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between WEBS and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.