WEBS vs. IFED
WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WEBS tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WEBS returned -44.25%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for IFED. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. WEBS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
WEBS vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -11.73% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -2.92% return.
WEBS
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -16.73%
- YTD
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -16.44%
- 3Y*
- -44.25%
- 5Y*
- -33.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBS vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | -11.73% | -40.66% | -56.62% | -75.58% | 117.15% | 15.34% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -2.92% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBS and IFED is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | -0.72 |
The correlation between WEBS and IFED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.72 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBS vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
WEBS
IFED
WEBS vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBS | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 0.05 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 0.13 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBS vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBS | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -22.36% | -77.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.54% | -14.65% | -38.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | -22.36% | -67.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.57% | -4.91% | -94.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.18% | -5.83% | -85.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 6.04% | +18.06% |
Volatility
WEBS vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 6.87%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBS | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.31% | 6.87% | +11.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.79% | 15.11% | +32.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.11% | 17.72% | +42.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 20.00% | +62.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.49% | 20.00% | +69.49% |
WEBS vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBS vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | 3.10% | 3.77% | 8.02% | 8.51% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBS and IFED have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBS has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to IFED (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 14.75% vs -44.25% for WEBS. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 14.75% return vs -44.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.
WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
WEBS tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBS and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer