WEBL vs. NVDX
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WEBL is passively managed, while NVDX is actively managed. Over the past year, WEBL returned -8.47% vs 57.42% for NVDX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDX.
Performance
WEBL vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -14.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 5.90% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -15.88%
- 1Y
- -8.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- -21.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -26.24%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 57.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBL vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -14.87% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 55.33% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 5.90% | 26.24% | 384.03% | 28.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and NVDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between WEBL and NVDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WEBL vs. NVDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
NVDX
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
WEBL
NVDX
Communication Services
WEBL
NVDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
NVDX
-
Financial Services
WEBL
NVDX
-
Industrials
WEBL
NVDX
-
Healthcare
WEBL
NVDX
-
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
NVDX
-
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
NVDX
-
Energy
WEBL
-
NVDX
-
Real Estate
WEBL
-
NVDX
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
NVDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
NVDX
WEBL vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.16 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 2.58 | -3.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than NVDX's maximum drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and NVDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -68.19% | -26.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -43.76% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.94% | -26.24% | -48.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.90% | -20.30% | -38.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.44% | 19.70% | +6.74% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 19.12%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 26.64%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.12% | 26.64% | -7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.07% | 53.29% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.70% | 70.00% | -12.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.76% | 95.57% | -14.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.82% | 95.57% | -12.75% |
WEBL vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than NVDX's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 3.16% | 3.35% | 15.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.23% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and NVDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDX has higher volatility (26.64%) compared to WEBL (19.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs NVDX's -68.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 57.42% vs -8.47% for WEBL. On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 57.42% return vs -8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 0.23% for WEBL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 1.05% for NVDX.
NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and NVDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer