PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBL vs. DUSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEBL vs. DUSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEBL vs. DUSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
-38.49%2.37%76.78%165.50%-91.04%2.73%132.56%13.47%
DUSL
Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares
8.66%37.50%34.75%37.23%-31.17%60.72%-19.77%-0.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -38.49% return, which is significantly lower than DUSL's 8.66% return.


WEBL

1D
10.51%
1M
-13.07%
YTD
-38.49%
6M
-47.90%
1Y
-10.71%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
-24.23%
10Y*

DUSL

1D
9.83%
1M
-25.04%
YTD
8.66%
6M
7.85%
1Y
57.49%
3Y*
37.81%
5Y*
17.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEBL vs. DUSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DUSL's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEBL vs. DUSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBL
WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DUSL
DUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBL vs. DUSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBLDUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

0.97

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

1.57

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.22

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

1.75

-1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.55

6.16

-6.70

WEBL vs. DUSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the DUSL Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBL and DUSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBLDUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.97

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.34

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.26

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between WEBL and DUSL is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WEBL vs. DUSL - Dividend Comparison

WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than DUSL's 10.54% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
0.32%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.79%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%
DUSL
Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares
10.54%11.39%6.61%1.28%0.66%0.07%0.48%1.01%1.46%0.57%

Drawdowns

WEBL vs. DUSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than DUSL's maximum drawdown of -85.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and DUSL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBLDUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-85.74%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.57%

-34.87%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.44%

-58.43%

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.89%

-27.16%

-54.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-22.15%

-36.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.61%

9.89%

+12.72%

Volatility

WEBL vs. DUSL - Volatility Comparison

Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL) at 19.84%. This indicates that WEBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEBLDUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

19.84%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.90%

35.84%

+9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.97%

59.50%

+12.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.81%

51.98%

+28.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.50%

61.63%

+21.87%