WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE
WEBG.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist) and XDWL.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D) are both Global Equities funds - WEBG.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while XDWL.DE tracks the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WEBG.DE returned 25.60% vs 23.89% for XDWL.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WEBG.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XDWL.DE.
Performance
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBG.DE achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than XDWL.DE's 13.09% return.
WEBG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWL.DE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 14.07% | 9.19% | 6.71% |
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D | 13.09% | 7.90% | 16.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBG.DE and XDWL.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between WEBG.DE and XDWL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WEBG.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDWL.DE
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBG.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.80 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 15.14 | -12.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, smaller than the maximum XDWL.DE drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBG.DE and XDWL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBG.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.31% | -33.66% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.74% | -6.26% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.04% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -4.54% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.88% | 1.57% | +7.31% |
Volatility
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) at 2.37%. This indicates that WEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBG.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.37% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 7.99% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 11.27% | +13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 14.15% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.04% | +5.50% |
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBG.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WEBG.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Dividend Comparison
WEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.21% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D | 1.14% | 1.28% | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.08% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 1.40% | 1.94% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, WEBG.DE and XDWL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XDWL.DE.
WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while XDWL.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for WEBG.DE and 0.12% for XDWL.DE.
Find the right allocation for WEBG.DE and XDWL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer