PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) and iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D
-1.27%7.90%26.08%20.26%-13.72%32.78%5.44%31.23%-5.02%7.74%
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
-0.91%6.86%26.84%20.25%-13.06%31.79%6.12%31.22%-4.69%7.79%
Different Trading Currencies

XDWL.DE is traded in EUR, while IWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWRD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWL.DE achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than IWRD.L's -0.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWL.DE having a 11.93% annualized return and IWRD.L not far ahead at 12.11%.


XDWL.DE

1D
2.09%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
2.16%
1Y
12.19%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
11.93%

IWRD.L

1D
2.50%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
2.39%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWL.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWRD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWL.DE
XDWL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDWL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IWRD.L
IWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) and iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWL.DEIWRD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.78

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.12

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.45

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

6.13

+0.05

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWL.DE and IWRD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWL.DEIWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.78

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.78

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.46

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between XDWL.DE and IWRD.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, which matches IWRD.L's 1.28% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDWL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D
1.28%1.28%1.65%1.58%1.77%2.08%1.95%1.98%1.40%1.94%1.83%0.00%
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
1.28%1.25%1.36%1.65%1.76%1.41%1.55%2.13%2.39%2.13%2.18%2.72%

Drawdowns

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum IWRD.L drawdown of -51.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWL.DE and IWRD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWL.DEIWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-37.12%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.25%

-10.60%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-18.89%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-25.23%

-8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-3.61%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.62%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.81%

+0.18%

Volatility

XDWL.DE vs. IWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) and iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDWL.DEIWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.60%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

8.47%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

15.72%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

14.13%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.22%

-0.06%