PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) (WEBC.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBC.DE achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than SC0H.DE's 12.24% return.


WEBC.DE

1D
0.29%
1M
0.85%
6M
12.39%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SC0H.DE

1D
0.29%
1M
0.74%
6M
13.09%
YTD
12.24%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WEBC.DE
Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist)
11.45%3.77%30.70%6.86%
SC0H.DE
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
12.24%4.77%32.56%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023

0.98

The correlation between WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBC.DE
WEBC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WEBC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0H.DE
SC0H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) (WEBC.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBC.DESC0H.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.25

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

11.14

-1.34

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBC.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum SC0H.DE drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBC.DESC0H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-41.34%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-7.32%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.60%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-8.51%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.14%

+0.20%

Volatility

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) (WEBC.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBC.DESC0H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.70%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

8.13%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

12.06%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

15.46%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.22%

-1.53%

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0H.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WEBC.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Dividend Comparison

WEBC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while SC0H.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
SC0H.DE
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WEBC.DE
Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.78%0.99%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SC0H.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0H.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for WEBC.DE.

WEBC.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Broad CTB Select Index, while SC0H.DE tracks MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for WEBC.DE and 0.05% for SC0H.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBC.DE and SC0H.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer