WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE
WEBA.DE (Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D) and UIC2.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Technology Equities funds - WEBA.DE tracks the Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight while UIC2.DE tracks the Solactive China Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WEBA.DE returned 16.93%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for UIC2.DE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEBA.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for UIC2.DE.
Performance
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBA.DE achieves a 22.42% return, which is significantly higher than UIC2.DE's -6.51% return.
WEBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 22.02%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIC2.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- 0.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D | 22.42% | 1.17% | 15.40% | 31.31% | -7.67% |
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -6.51% | 25.73% | 19.00% | -13.83% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBA.DE and UIC2.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WEBA.DE
UIC2.DE
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEBA.DE | UIC2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.04 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 0.02 | +4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 0.04 | +11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEBA.DE | UIC2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.02 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | -0.24 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum UIC2.DE drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBA.DE and UIC2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBA.DE | UIC2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -63.35% | +37.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -30.64% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.46% | -30.66% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -39.60% | +39.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -42.07% | +37.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 18.47% | -15.89% |
Volatility
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) is 3.95%, while UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that WEBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIC2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBA.DE | UIC2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 10.04% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 17.36% | -7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 33.06% | -19.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 37.72% | -21.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 37.40% | -20.85% |
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBA.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UIC2.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBA.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Dividend Comparison
WEBA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while UIC2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D | 0.55% | 0.73% | 0.63% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBA.DE and UIC2.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UIC2.DE.
WEBA.DE tracks Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight, while UIC2.DE tracks Solactive China Technology. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for WEBA.DE and 0.47% for UIC2.DE.
Find the right allocation for WEBA.DE and UIC2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer