UIC2.DE vs. EEM
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM).
UIC2.DE and EEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UIC2.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive China Technology. It was launched on Mar 5, 2021. EEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2003. Both UIC2.DE and EEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UIC2.DE or EEM.
Correlation
The correlation between UIC2.DE and EEM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UIC2.DE:
1.72
EEM:
1.05
UIC2.DE:
2.48
EEM:
1.56
UIC2.DE:
1.30
EEM:
1.19
UIC2.DE:
0.83
EEM:
0.61
UIC2.DE:
5.31
EEM:
3.16
UIC2.DE:
9.69%
EEM:
5.13%
UIC2.DE:
30.06%
EEM:
15.32%
UIC2.DE:
-63.35%
EEM:
-66.43%
UIC2.DE:
-41.61%
EEM:
-15.92%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIC2.DE achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than EEM's 6.19% return.
UIC2.DE
13.64%
13.80%
46.82%
46.54%
N/A
N/A
EEM
6.19%
5.51%
3.03%
13.45%
2.30%
3.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIC2.DE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UIC2.DE vs. EEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UIC2.DE
EEM
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
UIC2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.29% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.23% |
Drawdowns
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIC2.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, roughly equal to the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIC2.DE and EEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UIC2.DE vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 4.00%. This indicates that UIC2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.