PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. TDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEAT vs. TDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Tidewater Inc. (TDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than TDW's 48.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WEAT having a -4.69% annualized return and TDW not far behind at -4.85%.


WEAT

1D
-3.29%
1M
6.29%
6M
13.54%
YTD
19.23%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
-10.44%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
-4.69%
ALL TIME*
-10.45%

TDW

1D
2.15%
1M
11.98%
6M
20.12%
YTD
48.60%
1Y
50.09%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
45.99%
10Y*
-4.85%
ALL TIME*
-0.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.43M$47.11M$55.89M
$15.37M$12.62M$15.36M

WEAT vs. TDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
19.23%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
48.60%-7.68%-24.13%95.69%244.07%23.96%-55.14%0.78%-21.60%-77.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and TDW is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. TDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TDW
TDW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEAT vs. TDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Tidewater Inc. (TDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEATTDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.73

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

3.60

-1.94

WEAT vs. TDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the TDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and TDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. TDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, smaller than the maximum TDW drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and TDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATTDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-99.80%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-29.10%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.21%

-70.35%

+30.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

-70.35%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-97.27%

+29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.22%

-96.37%

+15.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.30%

-49.15%

-14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

13.96%

-8.19%

Volatility

WEAT vs. TDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 8.78%, while Tidewater Inc. (TDW) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEATTDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

11.22%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

30.87%

-11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

54.11%

-31.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.33%

53.29%

-22.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

66.15%

-39.31%

Dividends

WEAT vs. TDW - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEAT nor TDW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%14.37%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEAT and TDW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDW has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to WEAT (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs TDW's -99.80%.

TDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEAT and TDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer