WEAT vs. SNOW
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Index (TWEAT), while SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, WEAT returned -7.18%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for SNOW. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WEAT vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 33.70% return.
WEAT
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- -10.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.18%
- 10Y*
- -4.69%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.45%
SNOW
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 52.20%
- YTD
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | $1.36B | $1.31B | $1.77B |
| $15.37M | $12.62M | $15.36M |
WEAT vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 19.23% | -17.14% | -19.26% | -25.19% | 7.98% | 19.39% | 14.84% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 33.70% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and SNOW is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
SNOW
WEAT vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEAT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 0.56 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 1.21 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -72.99% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -56.30% | +41.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.21% | -56.30% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | -72.99% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.22% | -27.02% | -54.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.30% | -48.72% | -14.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 26.11% | -20.34% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 8.78%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 9.54% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.79% | 52.74% | -32.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.84% | 66.43% | -43.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 62.02% | -31.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 62.28% | -35.44% |
Dividends
WEAT vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEAT nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WEAT and SNOW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to WEAT (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEAT and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer