WEAT vs. GLD
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WEAT returned -6.28%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for GLD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
WEAT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -6.28%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.
WEAT
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- -4.80%
- 3Y*
- -14.72%
- 5Y*
- -7.07%
- 10Y*
- -6.28%
GLD
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -8.78%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
WEAT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 12.27% | -17.14% | -19.26% | -25.19% | 7.98% | 19.39% | 5.81% | -1.35% | -1.17% | -12.79% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -4.79% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and GLD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.09 |
The correlation between WEAT and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
GLD
WEAT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEAT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.87 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 2.35 | -2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -45.56% | -38.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -24.46% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.27% | -24.46% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | -24.46% | -43.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | -24.46% | -43.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.31% | -23.91% | -58.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.17% | -16.17% | -47.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.64% | 9.10% | +0.54% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 4.87%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 8.18% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | 24.38% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 27.57% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 18.24% | +12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 16.04% | +10.74% |
WEAT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEAT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEAT nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WEAT and GLD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to WEAT (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 11.59% vs -6.28% for WEAT. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WEAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 11.59% return vs -6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
WEAT and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GLD is Gold. WEAT tracks Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEAT and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer