WEAT vs. CXRN
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. WEAT is passively managed, while CXRN is actively managed. Over the past year, WEAT returned -2.52% vs -25.61% for CXRN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.
Performance
WEAT vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -16.09% return.
WEAT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- -10.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- -7.13%
CXRN
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -22.43%
- YTD
- -16.09%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- -25.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEAT vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 12.52% | -17.14% | 0.00% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -16.09% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and CXRN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between WEAT and CXRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
CXRN
WEAT vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEAT | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.90 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.96 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | -1.82 | +1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEAT | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | -0.71 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.65 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than CXRN's maximum drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -47.82% | -36.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -26.83% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.27% | -47.82% | -34.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.13% | -30.13% | -33.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 14.07% | -2.75% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 9.88%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 15.47% | -5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 26.83% | -8.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 36.45% | -13.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 36.94% | -6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 36.94% | -10.14% |
WEAT vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEAT vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.69% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEAT and CXRN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to WEAT (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs CXRN's -47.82%.
On 1-year performance, WEAT leads with -2.52% vs -25.61% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEAT has been the lower-risk option at 9.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WEAT has performed better with a -2.52% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.
WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 0.95% for CXRN.
WEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEAT and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer