PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEACX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEACX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEACX achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 20.27% return.


WEACX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.29%
YTD
13.44%
6M
12.46%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*

MHELX

1D
1.30%
1M
4.02%
YTD
20.27%
6M
19.08%
1Y
40.05%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEACX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEACX
Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
13.44%20.01%15.43%18.33%-19.88%19.02%22.18%23.49%-10.18%22.33%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
20.27%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WEACX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between WEACX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEACX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEACX
WEACX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEACX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEACXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

4.70

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

15.78

-3.46

WEACX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEACX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEACX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEACX drawdown since its inception was -27.06%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEACX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEACXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-61.24%

+34.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.52%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-30.81%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-32.01%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.20%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-12.91%

+7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.53%

-0.14%

Volatility

WEACX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEACXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

15.78%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

19.73%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

21.09%

-5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

21.02%

-6.09%

WEACX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEACX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEACX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

WEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than MHELX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.00%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%
WEACX
Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
10.79%12.24%7.24%0.00%4.56%14.17%11.86%0.43%20.98%17.50%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEACX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to WEACX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEACX dropped -27.06% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

WEACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEACX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer