WEA vs. SICIX
WEA (Western Asset Premier Bond Fund) and SICIX (SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, WEA returned 4.45%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for SICIX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WEA vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEA achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WEA has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 4.45%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return.
WEA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
WEA vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEA Western Asset Premier Bond Fund | -0.92% | 10.59% | 7.73% | 9.58% | -20.24% | 6.88% | 2.75% | 28.46% | -6.88% | 13.60% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.10% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEA and SICIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2003 | 0.27 |
The correlation between WEA and SICIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEA vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
WEA
SICIX
WEA vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Premier Bond Fund (WEA) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEA | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.43 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 2.42 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 9.30 | -6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEA vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEA drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEA and SICIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEA | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.76% | -27.62% | -30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -2.65% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -3.21% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.31% | -10.94% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.82% | -11.61% | -26.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -0.70% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -3.56% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 0.69% | +1.81% |
Volatility
WEA vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Premier Bond Fund (WEA) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.84%. This indicates that WEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEA | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 0.84% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 2.19% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 2.85% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 3.89% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 3.91% | +10.10% |
Dividends
WEA vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
WEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than SICIX's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
WEA Western Asset Premier Bond Fund | 7.94% | 7.62% | 7.80% | 7.44% | 7.44% | 5.53% | 5.59% | 5.37% | 6.49% | 6.26% | 7.93% | 8.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEA and SICIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEA has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to SICIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEA dropped -57.76% vs SICIX's -27.62%.
SICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEA and SICIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer