PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE vs. MST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDTE vs. MST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than MST's -46.90% return.


WDTE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.43%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.04%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MST

1D
-14.62%
1M
-51.85%
YTD
-46.90%
6M
-62.90%
1Y
-92.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDTE vs. MST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and MST is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDTE vs. MST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MST
MST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MST Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MST Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MST Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MST Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE vs. MST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDTEMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.78

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

-0.98

+4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

-1.28

+16.80

WDTE vs. MST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the MST Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and MST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDTEMSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

-0.74

+3.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.74

+2.08

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. MST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum MST drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and MST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTEMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-94.99%

+79.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-94.99%

+87.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-94.34%

+93.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-62.22%

+60.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

72.32%

-70.77%

Volatility

WDTE vs. MST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 2.37%, while Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) has a volatility of 35.73%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDTEMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

35.73%

-33.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

101.54%

-93.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

126.60%

-116.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

123.87%

-112.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

123.87%

-112.53%

WDTE vs. MST - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MST's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDTE vs. MST - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, less than MST's 891.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MST
Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF
891.75%381.22%0.00%0.00%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
31.86%35.78%51.80%16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDTE and MST have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MST has higher volatility (35.73%) compared to WDTE (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs MST's -94.99%.

On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 24.07% vs -92.85% for MST. On fees, WDTE is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 24.07% return vs -92.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDTE is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.

MST has the higher dividend yield at 891.75%, compared with 31.86% for WDTE.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 1.31% for MST.

WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDTE and MST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer