WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L
WDSC.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from State Street - WDSC.L tracks the MSCI World Small Cap Index while ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDSC.L returned 9.63%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for ACWD.L. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WDSC.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDSC.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than ACWD.L's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, WDSC.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 9.63%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.
WDSC.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.61%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.13M | $19.49M | $17.59M | |
| $949.95K | $851.82K | $604.30K |
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDSC.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.81% | 20.00% | 7.53% | 16.42% | -18.49% | 14.70% | 16.17% | 26.07% | -14.61% | 21.92% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 9.39% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDSC.L and ACWD.L is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between WDSC.L and ACWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WDSC.L
ACWD.L
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (WDSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.24 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 8.80 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDSC.L drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDSC.L and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -33.64% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.73% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.33% | -16.51% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -26.18% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -33.64% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -2.60% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -4.86% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.23% | +0.39% |
Volatility
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (WDSC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that WDSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.51% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 10.81% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 13.14% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 15.64% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 15.74% | +2.79% |
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WDSC.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WDSC.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDSC.L.
WDSC.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDSC.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for WDSC.L and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer