WDO.TO vs. SEZL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WDO.TO (Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.) and SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. WDO.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past year, WDO.TO returned 28.38% vs -3.05% for SEZL. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (WDO.TO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WDO.TO is traded in CAD, while SEZL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SEZL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDO.TO achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 113.52% return.

WDO.TO

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -18.02%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 28.38%
• 3Y*: 51.49%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 30.81%

SEZL

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: 32.33%
• YTD: 113.52%
• 6M: 91.52%
• 1Y: -3.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WDO.TO Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.	11.61%	76.14%	67.44%	11.26%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	113.52%	42.09%	1,252.14%	-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WDO.TO and SEZL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap WDO.TO : CA$3.84B SEZL : $4.64B
EPS WDO.TO : CA$2.68 SEZL : $4.15
PE Ratio WDO.TO : 9.47 SEZL : 32.00
PEG Ratio WDO.TO : 0.11 SEZL : 0.06
PS Ratio WDO.TO : 3.74 SEZL : 9.87
PB Ratio WDO.TO : 3.77 SEZL : 23.56
Total Revenue (TTM) WDO.TO : CA$1.03B SEZL : $480.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) WDO.TO : CA$636.67M SEZL : $426.79M
EBITDA (TTM) WDO.TO : CA$694.56M SEZL : $193.18M

Return for Risk

WDO.TO vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDO.TO

WDO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
WDO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WDO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WDO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WDO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WDO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (WDO.TO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDO.TO	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	-0.04	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	0.59	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.08	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	-0.04	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.51	-0.06	+2.57

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDO.TO and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDO.TO drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDO.TO and SEZL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDO.TO	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.14%	-89.86%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.42%	-71.13%	+45.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.02%	-25.01%	+6.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.24%	-39.91%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.33%	52.97%	-41.64%

Volatility

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (WDO.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.04% compared to Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) at 17.55%. This indicates that WDO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDO.TO	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.04%	17.55%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.78%	62.30%	-20.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.05%	87.56%	-35.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.93%	204.37%	-156.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.26%	204.37%	-151.11%

Dividends

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDO.TO nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WDO.TO vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WDO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 188.53M and revenue of 299.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

WDO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 177.51M and revenue of 299.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.2%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

WDO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 118.88M and revenue of 299.79M, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDO.TO and SEZL in my portfolio?

WDO.TO and SEZL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.