WDNA vs. BTEC
WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WDNA tracks the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
WDNA vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WDNA
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 50.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.78%
- 10Y*
- —
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDNA vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 2.90% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
WDNA vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDNA
BTEC
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
WDNA
BTEC
Basic Materials
WDNA
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
WDNA
BTEC
-
Energy
WDNA
BTEC
-
Communication Services
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Financial Services
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
WDNA
-
BTEC
Real Estate
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Technology
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
WDNA
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDNA vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
WDNA
BTEC
WDNA vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDNA | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDNA | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WDNA vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDNA | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | 0.00% | -58.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.86% | 0.00% | -29.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.64% | 0.00% | -35.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility
WDNA vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDNA | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 0.00% | +25.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 0.00% | +25.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 0.00% | +25.07% |
WDNA vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDNA vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 4.19% | 4.57% | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.38% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.
WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
WDNA tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for WDNA and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer