PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

WDMF.AX (iShares World Equity Factor ETF) and IXJ.AX (iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)) are both exchange-traded funds - WDMF.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares World Equity Factor Index, while IXJ.AX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares Global Healthcare Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDMF.AX returned 12.09%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for IXJ.AX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares World Equity Factor ETF (WDMF.AX) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDMF.AX achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ.AX's -2.02% return.

WDMF.AX

1D
-1.28%
1M
0.58%
6M
4.22%
YTD
4.62%
1Y
13.46%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
—

IXJ.AX

1D
1.59%
1M
6.23%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-2.02%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDMF.AX
iShares World Equity Factor ETF		4.62%15.40%30.82%14.10%-8.56%26.94%0.86%23.27%-3.75%18.89%
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		-2.02%6.85%9.96%2.24%2.57%28.06%2.33%26.80%11.28%15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares World Equity Factor ETF

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)

Often compared with WDMF.AX:
WDMF.AX vs. AUMF.AXWDMF.AX vs. BILL.AXWDMF.AX vs. GLIN.AXWDMF.AX vs. IAA.AXWDMF.AX vs. IHOO.AXWDMF.AX vs. IKO.AXWDMF.AX vs. ILB.AX
Often compared with IXJ.AX:
IXJ.AX vs. AUMF.AXIXJ.AX vs. BILL.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLDN.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLIN.AXIXJ.AX vs. ILB.AXIXJ.AX vs. IOZ.AXIXJ.AX vs. IVV.AX

Return for Risk

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WDMF.AX
WDMF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
WDMF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDMF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDMF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WDMF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDMF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX
IXJ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares World Equity Factor ETF (WDMF.AX) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

WDMF.AXIXJ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.33
0.56

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.89
0.93

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.48

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

1.04

+3.04

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDMF.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDMF.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.36%, which is greater than IXJ.AX's maximum drawdown of -17.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WDMF.AXIXJ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-17.30%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-17.30%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-17.30%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-17.30%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-17.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-6.02%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-4.02%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

8.12%

-4.88%

Volatility

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares World Equity Factor ETF (WDMF.AX) is 2.63%, while iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that WDMF.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXJ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WDMF.AXIXJ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

5.75%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

11.65%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

14.97%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

13.62%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

14.61%

-1.49%

Dividends

WDMF.AX vs. IXJ.AX - Dividend Comparison

WDMF.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than IXJ.AX's 1.10% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		1.10%0.94%1.56%1.44%1.71%1.37%1.89%2.86%0.74%3.99%5.60%9.60%
WDMF.AX
iShares World Equity Factor ETF		3.06%3.16%5.04%2.73%8.42%5.27%1.58%1.56%3.60%3.66%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDMF.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while IXJ.AX is Health & Biotech Equities. WDMF.AX tracks iShares World Equity Factor Index, while IXJ.AX tracks iShares Global Healthcare Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDMF.AX and IXJ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer