IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX
IXJ.AX (iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)) and BILL.AX (iShares Core Cash ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXJ.AX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares Global Healthcare Index, while BILL.AX is a Money Market fund tracking the S&P/ASX Bank Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IXJ.AX returned 5.66%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for BILL.AX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXJ.AX achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly lower than BILL.AX's 2.24% return.
IXJ.AX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
BILL.AX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXJ.AX iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) | -3.55% | 6.85% | 9.96% | 2.24% | 2.57% | 28.06% | 2.33% | 26.80% | 11.28% | 3.50% |
BILL.AX iShares Core Cash ETF | 2.24% | 4.25% | 4.57% | 3.93% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXJ.AX and BILL.AX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2017 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX — Risk / Return Rank
IXJ.AX
BILL.AX
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) and iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXJ.AX | BILL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 3.26 | -2.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 11.39 | -10.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 37.49 | -36.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXJ.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.30%, which is greater than BILL.AX's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ.AX and BILL.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXJ.AX | BILL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.30% | -0.37% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.30% | -0.34% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -0.37% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.30% | -0.37% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | 0.00% | -7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -0.02% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 0.10% | +8.01% |
Volatility
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL.AX) at 0.07%. This indicates that IXJ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXJ.AX | BILL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 0.07% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 0.64% | +10.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 0.89% | +14.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 0.69% | +12.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 0.55% | +14.06% |
Dividends
IXJ.AX vs. BILL.AX - Dividend Comparison
IXJ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BILL.AX's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILL.AX iShares Core Cash ETF | 3.97% | 4.13% | 4.46% | 3.69% | 0.98% | 0.02% | 0.46% | 1.50% | 1.83% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXJ.AX iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.56% | 1.44% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 1.89% | 2.86% | 0.74% | 3.99% | 5.60% | 9.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXJ.AX and BILL.AX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXJ.AX is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BILL.AX is Money Market. IXJ.AX tracks iShares Global Healthcare Index, while BILL.AX tracks S&P/ASX Bank Bill Index.
Find the right allocation for IXJ.AX and BILL.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer