WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WDEE.L (Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - WDEE.L tracks the S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index while XDW0.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WDEE.L returned 19.17%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for XDW0.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WDEE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.L.

Performance

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WDEE.L having a 30.95% return and XDW0.L slightly higher at 31.66%.

WDEE.L

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 30.95%
• 6M: 29.56%
• 1Y: 39.49%
• 3Y*: 19.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDW0.L

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 31.66%
• 6M: 30.41%
• 1Y: 46.43%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 19.33%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WDEE.L Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc	30.95%	9.01%	4.02%	7.64%
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C	31.66%	14.66%	2.10%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WDEE.L and XDW0.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.96

The correlation between WDEE.L and XDW0.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEE.L

WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XDW0.L

XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDEE.L	XDW0.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.40	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.99	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	3.81	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	12.79	-0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEE.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDEE.L	XDW0.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.40	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.39	+0.45

Drawdowns

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.L and XDW0.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDEE.L	XDW0.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-63.72%	+45.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-12.14%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.54%	-18.90%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-5.50%	+2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-12.31%	+8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.62%	-0.37%

Volatility

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) is 6.80%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that WDEE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDEE.L	XDW0.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.80%	7.44%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.28%	16.32%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	19.27%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.11%	24.24%	-5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	26.17%	-7.06%

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WDEE.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDEE.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDEE.L and XDW0.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, WDEE.L and XDW0.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WDEE.L or XDW0.L?

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDEE.L or XDW0.L?

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.

What is the main difference between WDEE.L and XDW0.L?

WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.L and 0.25% for XDW0.L.