WDCX vs. RGTU
WDCX (Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. WDCX is passively managed, while RGTU is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDCX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.
Performance
WDCX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WDCX
- 1D
- 11.34%
- 1M
- 74.95%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -20.18%
- 1M
- 54.24%
- YTD
- -26.71%
- 6M
- -51.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDCX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WDCX Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF | 346.72% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -23.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDCX and RGTU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDCX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF (WDCX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDCX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 48.43 | 0.16 | +48.27 |
Drawdowns
WDCX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDCX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDCX and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDCX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -96.96% | +58.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -91.80% | +91.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -62.21% | +52.54% |
Volatility
WDCX vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDCX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.88% | 219.68% | -70.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.88% | 219.68% | -70.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.88% | 219.68% | -70.80% |
WDCX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDCX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
WDCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 28.15% | 20.63% |
WDCX Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDCX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for WDCX.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.15%, compared with 0.00% for WDCX.
Their fees differ too: 1.49% for WDCX and 1.30% for RGTU.
Find the right allocation for WDCX and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer