WDCX vs. INTW
WDCX (Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WDCX is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDCX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
WDCX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WDCX
- 1D
- -7.82%
- 1M
- 62.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 741.14%
- 6M
- 775.21%
- 1Y
- 1,708.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDCX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WDCX Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF | 415.19% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 595.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDCX and INTW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDCX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
WDCX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
WDCX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF (WDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDCX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 35.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 79.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDCX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDCX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDCX and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDCX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -60.58% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.72% | -13.43% | -13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -29.61% | +19.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.72% | — |
Volatility
WDCX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDCX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.60% | 150.16% | +10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.60% | 148.67% | +11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.60% | 148.67% | +11.93% |
WDCX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDCX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither WDCX nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WDCX and INTW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDCX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDCX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
WDCX and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for WDCX and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for WDCX and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer