WDAF vs. XAR
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index while XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
WDAF vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 13.40% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
WDAF vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 9.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and XAR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
XAR
WDAF vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.85 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -46.37% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -6.55% | -9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -6.79% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.05% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 26.81% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 23.41% | +8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 24.62% | +7.48% |
WDAF vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than XAR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and XAR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.35% for XAR.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer