WDAF vs. WTV
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WDAF is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
WDAF vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WDAF having a 10.54% return and WTV slightly lower at 10.06%.
WDAF
- 1D
- -5.17%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 10.54% | -7.71% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 10.06% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and WTV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTV
WDAF vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -42.18% | +22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.04% | -1.54% | -15.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -5.03% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.59% | 11.90% | +20.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 17.08% | +15.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 20.16% | +12.43% |
WDAF vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than WTV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 1.66% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and WTV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.12% for WTV.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer