WDAF vs. WTV
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WDAF is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
WDAF vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 15.41% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 26.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $216.97K | $187.82K | $494.71K | |
| $14.86M | $15.92M | $16.27M |
WDAF vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 1.82% | -7.71% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 15.41% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and WTV is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTV
WDAF vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -42.18% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.59% | -0.68% | -22.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -4.97% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.45% | 11.66% | +21.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 17.02% | +16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 20.07% | +13.38% |
WDAF vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than WTV's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund | 1.85% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and WTV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.13% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.12% for WTV.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer