WDAF vs. DHS
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
WDAF vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 9.88% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
WDAF vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 9.88% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and DHS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
DHS
WDAF vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.41 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -67.25% | +49.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -2.60% | -13.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -9.55% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.71% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 10.01% | +22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 13.89% | +18.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 16.08% | +16.02% |
WDAF vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.35% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and DHS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer