WDAF vs. DBE
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
WDAF vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
WDAF vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and DBE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
DBE
WDAF vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.09 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -86.69% | +68.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -30.27% | +14.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -57.31% | +51.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 34.97% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 29.39% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 28.33% | +3.77% |
WDAF vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and DBE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DBE is Oil & Gas. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.78% for DBE.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer