WDAF vs. AAA
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and AAA (AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while AAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Alternative Access Funds LLC. WDAF is passively managed, while AAA is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AAA.
Performance
WDAF vs. AAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than AAA's 1.86% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. AAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF | 1.86% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and AAA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. AAA — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
AAA
WDAF vs. AAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.93 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. AAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than AAA's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and AAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -2.63% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -0.22% | -15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -0.30% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. AAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 2.30% | +29.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 2.28% | +29.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 2.15% | +29.95% |
WDAF vs. AAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AAA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. AAA - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than AAA's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF | 4.90% | 5.11% | 6.17% | 6.11% | 2.78% | 1.06% | 0.32% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and AAA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
AAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while AAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Alternative Access Funds LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.25% for AAA.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and AAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer