WCQGX vs. WLIVX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX).

WCQGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 30, 2020. WLIVX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Jun 28, 2020.

Performance

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	-3.58%	20.97%	-3.03%	-18.49%	-26.70%	4.03%	32.97%
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund	-1.58%	40.75%	12.13%	18.08%	-26.40%	17.41%	31.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCQGX achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than WLIVX's -1.58% return.

WCQGX

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: -3.58%
• 6M: -12.57%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: -3.22%
• 5Y*: -8.42%
• 10Y*: —

WLIVX

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -6.55%
• YTD: -1.58%
• 6M: -0.49%
• 1Y: 30.89%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WCQGX and WLIVX have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

WCQGX

WCM China Quality Growth Fund

WLIVX

WCM Focused International Value Fund

Return for Risk

WCQGX vs. WLIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCQGX

WCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
WCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

WLIVX

WLIVX Risk / Return Rank: 77
WLIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
WLIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
WLIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
WLIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WLIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCQGX	WLIVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.55	-1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	2.14	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.31	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	1.95	-1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.65	8.30	-7.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCQGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the WLIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCQGX and WLIVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCQGX	WLIVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	1.55	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	0.47	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.76	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between WCQGX and WLIVX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Dividend Comparison

WCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than WLIVX's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	6.91%	6.67%	2.02%	0.82%	0.28%	8.54%	2.38%
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund	2.24%	2.20%	1.31%	0.65%	0.32%	0.03%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCQGX drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than WLIVX's maximum drawdown of -37.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCQGX and WLIVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCQGX	WLIVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.28%	-37.86%	-21.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.08%	-13.24%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.82%	-37.86%	-19.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.45%	-8.73%	-35.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.13%	-10.77%	-23.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.65%	3.43%	+3.22%

Volatility

WCQGX vs. WLIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) is 7.14%, while WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that WCQGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCQGX	WLIVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	8.41%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	13.36%	+2.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.78%	20.67%	+2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.45%	18.21%	+5.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.76%	17.97%	+5.79%