WCQGX vs. BGCBX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX).

WCQGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 30, 2020. BGCBX is managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. It was launched on Jul 6, 2021.

Performance

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	-3.58%	20.97%	-3.03%	-18.49%	-26.70%	-10.94%
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	-6.09%	36.51%	9.74%	-18.00%	-28.56%	-17.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCQGX achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly higher than BGCBX's -6.09% return.

WCQGX

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: -3.58%
• 6M: -12.57%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: -3.22%
• 5Y*: -8.42%
• 10Y*: —

BGCBX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -6.36%
• YTD: -6.09%
• 6M: -11.53%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCQGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BGCBX's 0.96% expense ratio.

WCQGX

WCM China Quality Growth Fund

BGCBX

Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund

Return for Risk

WCQGX vs. BGCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCQGX

WCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
WCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BGCBX

BGCBX Risk / Return Rank: 13
BGCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BGCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BGCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BGCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BGCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCQGX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.50	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	0.79	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.11	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	0.63	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.65	2.02	-1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCQGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the BGCBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCQGX and BGCBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCQGX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.50	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	-0.29	+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between WCQGX and BGCBX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Dividend Comparison

WCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than BGCBX's 0.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	6.91%	6.67%	2.02%	0.82%	0.28%	8.54%	2.38%
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.97%	0.91%	2.03%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCQGX drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, roughly equal to the maximum BGCBX drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCQGX and BGCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCQGX	BGCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.28%	-59.07%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.08%	-15.88%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.45%	-32.77%	-11.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.13%	-38.61%	+4.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.65%	4.98%	+1.67%

Volatility

WCQGX vs. BGCBX - Volatility Comparison

WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) at 6.29%. This indicates that WCQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCQGX	BGCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	6.29%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	13.14%	+2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.78%	21.42%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.45%	27.29%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.76%	27.29%	-3.53%