PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCPIX vs. CYPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCPIX achieves a -8.71% return, which is significantly lower than CYPIX's -5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WCPIX has outperformed CYPIX with an annualized return of 16.91%, while CYPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.26% annualized return.


WCPIX

1D
-2.05%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-8.71%
6M
-6.32%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
16.91%

CYPIX

1D
-1.09%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-5.45%
6M
-5.16%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
-8.71%28.70%47.44%78.07%-54.07%25.49%33.81%21.51%22.32%-1.70%
CYPIX
ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund
-5.45%4.38%34.15%46.89%-45.26%29.22%39.07%37.98%-1.09%25.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WCPIX and CYPIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.62

The correlation between WCPIX and CYPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCPIX vs. CYPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCPIX
WCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CYPIX
CYPIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CYPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CYPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCPIXCYPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.07

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.36

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

1.06

+1.21

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CYPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCPIX and CYPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCPIXCYPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

0.30

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.15

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.43

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.38

-0.37

Drawdowns

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than CYPIX's maximum drawdown of -72.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPIX and CYPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCPIXCYPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.94%

-72.09%

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.09%

-22.57%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.29%

-37.71%

-38.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.29%

-47.00%

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.29%

-47.00%

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.59%

-11.10%

-63.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.49%

-14.28%

-72.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

7.59%

-2.31%

Volatility

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) is 5.58%, while ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that WCPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCPIXCYPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

7.84%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

19.67%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.89%

27.26%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.06%

33.82%

+101.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.30%

30.83%

+67.47%

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CYPIX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCPIX vs. CYPIX - Dividend Comparison

WCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while CYPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CYPIX
ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.00%18.51%3.71%0.00%5.29%
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
1.53%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.15%0.00%2.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCPIX and CYPIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CYPIX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to WCPIX (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCPIX dropped -98.94% vs CYPIX's -72.09%.

WCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCPIX and CYPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer