PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WCOS.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOS.L achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than ROBG.L's 27.71% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L has underperformed ROBG.L with an annualized return of 5.58%, while ROBG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.


WCOS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.03%
1Y
1.22%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
5.58%

ROBG.L

1D
-1.48%
1M
8.38%
YTD
27.71%
6M
26.40%
1Y
56.11%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCOS.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
3.82%8.52%5.94%1.94%-5.27%12.81%7.61%22.47%-10.18%17.35%
ROBG.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
27.71%23.33%-1.71%24.60%-33.82%15.99%45.19%30.37%-21.35%46.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOS.L and ROBG.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between WCOS.L and ROBG.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCOS.L
ROBG.L

Consumer Defensive

97.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
2.9%

Healthcare

0.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

45.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

45.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

WCOS.L
97.5%
ROBG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

WCOS.L
2.3%
ROBG.L
2.9%

Healthcare

WCOS.L
0.2%
ROBG.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Communication Services

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L
1.4%

Energy

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Financial Services

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Industrials

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L
45.6%

Real Estate

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Technology

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L
45.5%

Utilities

WCOS.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOS.L
WCOS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
WCOS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBG.L
ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOS.LROBG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.47

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

13.58

-13.31

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOS.L and ROBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOS.LROBG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

2.47

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.31

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Drawdowns

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum ROBG.L drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOS.L and ROBG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOS.LROBG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-43.06%

+19.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-16.08%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-27.75%

+16.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-43.06%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.55%

-43.06%

+19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-1.86%

-6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-13.32%

+9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.12%

+0.26%

Volatility

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) is 4.45%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that WCOS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOS.LROBG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

8.18%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

17.51%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

22.60%

-10.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

22.88%

-10.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

21.77%

-9.19%

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOS.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOS.L nor ROBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOS.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WCOS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WCOS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.

WCOS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ROBG.L is Robotics. WCOS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOS.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOS.L and ROBG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer