PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOS.L achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 5.64%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


WCOS.L

1D
0.67%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
3.77%
6M
3.26%
1Y
1.65%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
5.64%

ACWD.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.24%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCOS.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
3.77%8.52%5.94%1.94%-5.27%12.81%7.61%22.47%-10.18%17.35%
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
11.57%22.83%17.76%22.27%-18.37%18.77%15.91%25.80%-9.85%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOS.L and ACWD.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between WCOS.L and ACWD.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCOS.L
ACWD.L

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
9.3%

Healthcare

0.2%
8.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Energy

-

4.3%

Financial Services

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

29.2%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

WCOS.L
97.5%
ACWD.L
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

WCOS.L
2.3%
ACWD.L
9.3%

Healthcare

WCOS.L
0.2%
ACWD.L
8.0%

Basic Materials

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
3.6%

Communication Services

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
9.0%

Energy

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
4.3%

Financial Services

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
16.5%

Industrials

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
10.9%

Real Estate

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
1.7%

Technology

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
29.2%

Utilities

WCOS.L

-

ACWD.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOS.L
WCOS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
WCOS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWD.L
ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOS.LACWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.44

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.39

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

14.15

-13.77

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOS.L and ACWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOS.LACWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

2.36

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.73

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.80

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.73

-0.26

Drawdowns

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum ACWD.L drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOS.L and ACWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOS.LACWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-33.64%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-8.73%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-16.51%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-26.18%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.55%

-33.64%

+10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.86%

-0.66%

-8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.67%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

2.09%

+2.26%

Volatility

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) at 3.87%. This indicates that WCOS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOS.LACWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

3.87%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

9.89%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

12.56%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

15.58%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

15.85%

-3.27%

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOS.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOS.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOS.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOS.L.

WCOS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. WCOS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOS.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOS.L and ACWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer