PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOM.L vs. RICI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WCOM.L is traded in GBp, while RICI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the RICI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WCOM.L having a 33.12% return and RICI.L slightly higher at 34.46%.


WCOM.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
33.12%
6M
34.26%
1Y
45.20%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*

RICI.L

1D
1.17%
1M
0.03%
YTD
34.46%
6M
33.07%
1Y
43.58%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WCOM.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
33.12%15.31%2.49%-7.76%11.71%25.55%20.62%
RICI.L
Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF
34.46%-0.85%6.32%-10.69%30.66%42.40%19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOM.L and RICI.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2020

0.69

The correlation between WCOM.L and RICI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOM.L
WCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RICI.L
RICI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RICI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RICI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RICI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RICI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RICI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOM.LRICI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.38

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.34

5.19

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.12

11.35

+7.77

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the RICI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOM.L and RICI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOM.LRICI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.05

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.75

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.98

-0.32

Drawdowns

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, roughly equal to the maximum RICI.L drawdown of -26.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOM.L and RICI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOM.LRICI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.58%

-26.97%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-8.35%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.58%

-16.40%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.41%

-26.97%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-4.67%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-12.19%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.83%

-1.47%

Volatility

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) is 5.33%, while Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that WCOM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RICI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOM.LRICI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

7.40%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

18.27%

-3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

21.13%

-4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

18.73%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

18.88%

-4.96%

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RICI.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOM.L vs. RICI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOM.L nor RICI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOM.L and RICI.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WCOM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RICI.L.

WCOM.L tracks Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while RICI.L tracks Rogers International Commodity (RICI). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOM.L and 0.60% for RICI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOM.L and RICI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer