PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCLD vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCLD vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's -0.46% return.


WCLD

1D
-3.28%
1M
20.60%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
1.46%
1Y
-3.15%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
-6.46%
10Y*

GDMN

1D
1.35%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
6.04%
1Y
82.68%
3Y*
62.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCLD vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WCLD
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund
-0.69%-6.69%7.35%39.35%-51.64%3.74%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-0.46%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WCLD and GDMN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.15

The correlation between WCLD and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WCLD vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCLD
GDMN

Technology

97.2%

-

Healthcare

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WCLD
97.2%
GDMN

-

Healthcare

WCLD
2.8%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

WCLD
2.5%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

WCLD

-

GDMN
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Energy

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Financial Services

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Industrials

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Real Estate

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Utilities

WCLD

-

GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCLD vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCLD
WCLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCLD vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCLDGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

1.36

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

1.75

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.26

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

2.43

-2.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

5.81

-6.01

WCLD vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCLD and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCLDGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

1.36

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.83

-0.70

Drawdowns

WCLD vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCLDGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-52.82%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.68%

-39.03%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.06%

-39.03%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.78%

-34.66%

-12.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-18.87%

-16.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.71%

16.34%

-1.63%

Volatility

WCLD vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) is 15.21%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.89%. This indicates that WCLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCLDGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

17.89%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.91%

51.66%

-21.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.67%

61.52%

-26.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.41%

47.57%

-10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.46%

47.57%

-10.11%

WCLD vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WCLD and GDMN have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

WCLD vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.71%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%
WCLD
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCLD and GDMN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (17.89%) compared to WCLD (15.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 62.97% vs 4.16% for WCLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, WCLD has been the lower-risk option at 15.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 62.97% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WCLD and GDMN have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.

WCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDMN is Commodities.

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCLD and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer