WCLD vs. CHAT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. WCLD is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WCLD returned 4.20%/yr vs 43.86%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WCLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

WCLD vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 44.67% return.

WCLD

• 1D: 3.07%
• 1M: 9.13%
• 6M: 21.53%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 1Y: 7.59%
• 3Y*: 4.20%
• 5Y*: -9.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.46%

CHAT

• 1D: 4.08%
• 1M: -3.93%
• 6M: 36.65%
• YTD: 44.67%
• 1Y: 75.75%
• 3Y*: 43.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$62.52M	$56.73M	$66.46M
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund	$34.13M	$31.66M	$33.85M

WCLD vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund	4.48%	-6.69%	7.35%	24.82%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	44.67%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WCLD and CHAT is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between WCLD and CHAT has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCLD vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCLD	CHAT
Technology	97.2%	78.9%
Healthcare	2.8%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	15.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	3.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCLD vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCLD

WCLD Risk / Return Rank: 16
WCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
WCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 17
WCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
WCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 76
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCLD vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCLD	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	1.94	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	2.36	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.31	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	2.69	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	9.40	-8.90

WCLD vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCLD and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCLD vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCLD	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.90%	-31.34%	-33.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.68%	-28.34%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.06%	-31.34%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.01%	-18.04%	-25.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.87%	-5.75%	-30.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.43%	8.09%	+7.34%

Volatility

WCLD vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) is 10.69%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that WCLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCLD	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	16.63%	-5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.59%	34.48%	-2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.89%	39.30%	-2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.83%	32.47%	+5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.44%	32.47%	+4.97%

WCLD vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCLD vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.97%	2.85%
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCLD and CHAT in my portfolio?

WCLD and CHAT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCLD or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.63%) compared to WCLD (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, WCLD or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 43.86% vs 4.20% for WCLD. On fees, WCLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, WCLD has been the lower-risk option at 10.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCLD or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 43.86% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCLD or CHAT?

WCLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCLD or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.

What is the main difference between WCLD and CHAT?

WCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCLD and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.